Cited 8 times since 2014 (0.8 per year) source: EuropePMC International journal of cardiology, Volume 176, Issue 1, 28 4 2014, Pages 40-47 Beneficial effect of high dose statins on the vascular wall in patients with repaired aortic coarctation? Luijendijk P, Bouma BJ, Vriend JW, Groenink M, Vliegen HW, de Groot E, Pieper PG, van Dijk AP, Sieswerda GT, Konings TC, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Mulder BJ

Background

Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a marker for atherosclerosis. Adult post-coarctectomy patients (CoA) demonstrate an increased cardiovascular risk and increased CIMT compared to controls. This study evaluates the effect of high dose statins on the change in CIMT and cardiovascular risk.

Methods

We designed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label trial with blinded endpoint (PROBE design) to evaluate the effect of three year treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg on CIMT and cardiovascular risk. Primary endpoint was CIMT measured by B mode ultrasonography. Secondary endpoints were mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular disease and serum lipids.

Results

155 patients (36.3 ± 11.8 years, 96 (62%) male) were randomized (atorvastatin=80, no treatment=75). There was no significant effect of atorvastatin on the change in CIMT (treatment effect -0.005, 95% CI, -0.039-0.029; P=0.76). A significant effect on serum cholesterol and LDL levels was found (- 0.71, 95% CI, - 1.16 to - 0.26; P = 0.002 vs - 0.66, 95% CI - 1.06 to - 0.26; P = 0.001). There was no difference in secondary outcome measures. Baseline CIMT was higher in hypertensive compared to normotensive CoA. (0.69 ± 0.16 mm vs 0.61 ± 0.98 mm; P=0.002). Hypertension (ß=0.043, P=0.031) was the strongest determinant CIMT.

Conclusion

Three year treatment with atorvastatin does not lead to a reduction of CIMT and secondary outcome measures, despite a decrease in total cholesterol and LDL levels. Hypertensive CoA demonstrate the highest CIMT and the largest CIMT progression. Blood pressure control should be the main focus in CoA to decrease cardiovascular risk.

Int J Cardiol. 2014 6;176(1):40-47