Cited 43 times since 2013 (3.9 per year) source: EuropePMC International journal of cardiology, Volume 168, Issue 3, 10 2 2013, Pages 2441-2446 Circulating transforming growth factor-β as a prognostic biomarker in Marfan syndrome. Franken R, den Hartog AW, de Waard V, Engele L, Radonic T, Lutter R, Timmermans J, Scholte AJ, van den Berg MP, Zwinderman AH, Groenink M, Mulder BJ

Background

Patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) are at risk for cardiovascular disease. Marfan associated mutations in the FBN1 gene lead to increased transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) activation. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of plasma TGF-β as a biomarker for progressive aortic root dilatation and dissection.

Methods

Plasma TGF-β level and aortic root diameter by means of echocardiography were assessed in 99 MFS patients. After 38 months of follow-up measurement of the aortic root was repeated and individual aortic root growth curves were constructed. Clinical events were evaluated. The primary composite endpoint was defined as aortic dissection and prophylactic aortic root replacement.

Results

TGF-β levels were higher in MFS patients as compared to healthy controls (109 pg/ml versus 54 pg/ml, p<0.001). Higher plasma TGF-β levels correlated with larger aortic root dimensions (r=0.26, p=0.027), previous aortic root surgery (161 pg/ml versus 88 pg/ml, p=0.007) and faster aortic root growth rate (r=0.42, p<0.001). During 38 months of follow-up, 17 events were observed (four type B dissections and 13 aortic root replacements). Patients with TGF-β levels above 140 pg/ml had a 6.5 times higher risk of experiencing the composite endpoint compared to patients with TGF-β levels below 140 pg/ml (95% CI: 2.1 to 20.1, p=0.001) with 65% sensitivity and 78% specificity.

Conclusion

Elevated TGF-β level in patients with Marfan syndrome is correlated with larger aortic root diameters and faster aortic root growth. Level of plasma TGF-β predicts cardiovascular events and might serve as a prognostic biomarker in MFS.

Int J Cardiol. 2013 4;168(3):2441-2446