Cited 41 times since 2012 (3.4 per year) source: EuropePMC The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, Volume 14, Issue 3, 14 2 2012, Pages 247-255 KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in routine molecular diagnostics: comparison of three testing methods on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor-derived DNA. Heideman DA, Lurkin I, Doeleman M, Smit EF, Verheul HM, Meijer GA, Snijders PJ, Thunnissen E, Zwarthoff EC
Accurate mutation detection assays are strongly needed for use in routine molecular pathology analyses to aid in the selection of patients with cancer for targeted therapy. The high-resolution melting (HRM) assay is an ideal prescreening tool, and SNaPshot analysis offers a straightforward genotyping system. Our present study was determined to compare these mutation testing methods on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor-derived DNA. We compared the performance of HRM, followed by cycle sequencing (HRM-sequencing); multiplex PCR assay, followed by SNaPshot analysis (multiplex mutation assay); and a successor assay using HRM, followed by SNaPshot (HRM-SNaPshot) for mutation analysis of both KRAS (codon 12/13/61) and BRAF (codon 600/601). In a series of 195 FFPE-derived DNA specimens, a high genotypic concordance between HRM-sequencing and multiplex mutation assay was found (κ, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1), underlining the potential of a combined HRM-SNaPshot approach. In reconstruction experiments, the analytical sensitivity of HRM-SNaPshot was twofold to fourfold higher than HRM-sequencing and multiplex mutation assay, respectively. In addition, HRM-SNaPshot had a good performance rate (99%) on FFPE tumor-derived DNA, and mutation detection was highly concordant with the predecessor assays (κ for both, 0.98). The occurrence of BRAF and KRAS mutations is mutually exclusive. HRM-SNaPshot is an attractive method for mutation analysis in pathology, given its good performance rate on FFPE-derived DNA, high analytical sensitivity, and prescreening approach.
