Cited 21 times since 2009 (1.4 per year) source: EuropePMC Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Volume 53, Issue 7, 6 1 2009, Pages 941-948 Anti-ischemic effects of inotropic agents in experimental right ventricular infarction. Hein M, Roehl AB, Baumert JH, Scherer K, Steendijk P, Rossaint R

Background

Right ventricular (RV) function is an important determinant of survival after myocardial infarction. The efficacy of reperfusion therapy might be increased by the cardioprotective action of inotropic agents, which are used for symptomatic therapy in situations with compromised hemodynamics. Therefore, we used a porcine model of RV ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury to study the influence of milrinone, levosimendan and dobutamine on the extent and degree of myocardial injury.

Methods

IR injury was induced by temporary ligation of the distal right coronary artery for 90 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Treatment was initiated 30 min after coronary artery occlusion. A bolus of milrinone (n=12; 50 microg/kg) and levosimendan (n=10; 24 microg/kg) was applied in different groups, followed by continuous infusion of the drugs at 0.5 and 0.2 microg/kg/min, respectively. The effects on myocardial injury and inflammation were compared with a control (n=12) and a dobutamine group (n=10), where treatment was started with an infusion of 5 microg/kg/min.

Results

Milrinone and levosimendan reduced the resulting infarct size with respect to the area at risk (41.7+/-10.2%, 45.7+/-8.1%) when compared with the control group (58.3+/-6.1%). In contrast, dobutamine had no effect (55.8+/-7.7%). All drugs reduced the number of neutrophils infiltrating into the different myocardial regions and the circulating levels of interleukin-6. Increased levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha during reperfusion were only abated by milrinone and levosimendan.

Conclusions

Cardioprotective properties of milrinone and levosimendan were demonstrated for the first time in a clinically relevant model of RV infarction.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 5;53(7):941-948