Cited 1 times since 2006 (0.1 per year) source: EuropePMC Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, Volume 12, Issue 7, 28 4 2006, Pages CR308-14 Long-term follow-up of mitral valve repair: a single-center experience. Shahin GM, van der Heijden GJ, Kelder JC, Boulaksil M, Knaepen PJ, Six AJ

Background

Our aim was to conduct a long-term follow-up of patients after mitral valve repair for incompetence. We identified determinants for mortality and compared mortality with standardized mortality rates of the Dutch population.

Material/methods

We included in this single-center retrospective study 119 patients operated from March 1976 to February 1981. Patients with previous mitral valve surgery, isolated mitral stenosis, and congenital heart disease were excluded. Routine echocardiography was performed every 6 to 12 months. The cumulative probability of survival was calculated (Kaplan-Meier). The variables that statistically significantly associated with mortality were selected for multivariate analysis. Maximum follow-up was 27 years and complete in 98%. Mean age was 49.4 years, and 55% were preoperatively in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III. Concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 49%.

Results

The 30-day postoperative mortality was 6.7% and the 20-year overall mortality was 63%. The standardized mortality rate was 30%, which was based on survival rates of the general Dutch population. In 27 cases (22.7%), re-operation was performed. Independent predictors for mortality were, after univariate and multivariate analysis, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (p=0.002), renal impairment (p=0.027), age above 60 years (p=0.05), and ejection fraction

Conclusions

The observed mortality exceeded the expected mortality. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, renal impairment, age above 60 years, and reduced left ventricular function were independent predictors of mortality in patients with surgical repair for mitral valve regurgitation.

Med Sci Monit. 2006 6;12(7):CR308-14