Cited 8 times since 2000 (0.3 per year) source: EuropePMC Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, Volume 23, Issue 8, 1 1 2000, Pages 1232-1238 No gender differences in pacemaker selection in patients undergoing their first implantation. Roeters Van Lennep JE, Zwinderman AH, Roeters Van Lennep HW, Van Hemel NM, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE

Recent studies have indicated that women were less likely to receive sophisticated pacemaker devices than men. These differences could not be fully explained by demographic and clinical variables. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether a gender related difference might exist in pacemaker mode selection in patients undergoing their first implantation in The Netherlands. Records of first implants (n = 39,217) collected from 1988 through 1997 covering 95% of all implantations in The Netherlands. From this population 33,564 (85.6%) patients were included for final analysis. We observed no significant sex differences in pacemaker selection in patients with atrioventricular conduction disorders and bundle branch block. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, only very old women (> or = 85 years) had more atrial systems implanted than men of similar age (6.5% vs 3.5%), whereas men received more double chamber pacemakers (12.3% vs 10.3%) (P = 0.002). However, the relative distribution of physiological versus nonphysiological pacemakers in this subgroup was similar for men and women. In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation/flutter associated with bradycardia, sex differences were only apparent in the age group of 75-85 years; women received more dual chamber pacemakers (8.8% vs 5.3%) whereas men received more single chamber ventricular pacemakers (94.2% vs 89.8%) (P = 0.0011). With increasing age, sex differences in pacemaker selection were absent, but there was a considerable drop in implantation rate of dual chamber systems. Our study showed no major sex differences in the selection of pacemaker devices. Physicians select pacemaker devices by age rather than gender, which might be a rational choice.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 8;23(8):1232-1238