Cited 5 times since 2020 (1.4 per year) source: EuropePMC European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, Volume 21, Issue 11, 1 1 2020, Pages 1227-1234 Left ventricular mechanical dispersion in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: association with myocardial scar burden and prognostic implications. Abou R, Prihadi EA, Goedemans L, van der Geest R, El Mahdiui M, Schalij MJ, Ajmone Marsan N, Bax JJ, Delgado V

Aims

Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion (MD) may result from heterogeneous electrical conduction and is associated with adverse events. The present study investigated (i) the association between LV MD and the extent of LV scar as assessed with contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and (ii) the prognostic implications of LV MD in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods and results

LV MD was calculated by echocardiography and myocardial scar was analysed on CMR data retrospectively. Infarct core and border zone were defined as ≥50% and 35-50% of maximal signal intensity, respectively. Patients were followed for the occurrence of the combined endpoint (all-cause mortality and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy). In total, 96 patients (87% male, 57 ± 10 years) were included. Median LV MD was 53.5 ms [interquartile range (IQR) 43.4-62.8]. On CMR, total scar burden was 11.4% (IQR 3.8-17.1%), infarct core tissue 6.2% (IQR 2.0-12.7%), and border zone was 3.5% (IQR 1.5-5.7%). Correlations were observed between LV MD and infarct core (r = 0.517, P < 0.001), total scar burden (r = 0.497, P < 0.001), and border zone (r = 0.298, P = 0.003). In total, 14 patients (15%) reached the combined endpoint. Patients with LV MD >53.5 ms showed higher event rates as compared to their counterparts. Finally, LV MD showed the highest area under the curve for the prediction of the combined endpoint.

Conclusion

LV MD is correlated with LV scar burden. In addition, patients with prolonged LV MD showed higher event rates. Finally, LV MD provided the highest predictive value for the combined endpoint when compared with other parameters.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 10;21(11):1227-1234