Cited 12 times since 2019 (2.5 per year) source: EuropePMC JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, Volume 13, Issue 2 Pt 1, 12 2 2019, Pages 425-434 Application of Low Tube Potentials in CCTA: Results From the PROTECTION VI Study. Stocker TJ, Leipsic J, Hadamitzky M, Chen MY, Rubinshtein R, Deseive S, Heckner M, Bax JJ, Kitagawa K, Marques H, Schmermund A, Silva C, Mahmarian J, Kang JW, Grove EL, Lesser J, Massberg S, Hausleiter J
Objectives
The aim of this study was to assess the use of low tube potentials for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in worldwide clinical practice and its influence on radiation exposure, contrast agent volume, and image quality.
Background
CCTA is frequently used in clinical practice. Lowering of tube potential is a potent method to reduce radiation exposure and to economize contrast agent volume.
Methods
CCTAs of 4,006 patients from 61 international study sites were analyzed regarding very-low (≤80 kVp), low (90 to 100 kVp), conventional (110 to 120 kVp), and high (≥130 kVp) tube potentials. The impact on dose-length product (DLP) and contrast agent volume was analyzed. Image quality was determined by evaluation of the diagnostic applicability and assessment of the objective image parameters signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR).
Results
When compared with conventional tube potentials, low tube potentials were used in 56% of CCTAs (≤80 kVp: 9%; 90 to 100 kVp: 47%), which varied among sites from 0% to 100%. Tube potential reduction was associated with low-cardiovascular risk profile, low body mass index (BMI), and new-generation scanners. Median radiation exposure was lowered by 68% or 50% and median contrast agent volume by 25% or 13% for tube potential protocols of ≤80 kVp or 90 to 100 kVp when compared with conventional tube potentials, respectively (all p < 0.001). With the use of lower tube potentials, the frequency of diagnostic scans was maintained (p = 0.41), whereas SNR and CNR significantly improved (both p < 0.001). Considering BMI eligibility criteria, 58% (n = 946) of conventionally scanned patients would have been suitable for low tube potential protocols, and 44% (n = 831) of patients scanned with 90 to 100 kVp would have been eligible for very-low tube potential CCTA imaging of ≤80 kVp.
Conclusions
This large international registry confirms the feasibility of tube potential reduction in clinical practice leading to lower radiation exposure and lower contrast volumes. The current registry also demonstrates that this strategy is still underused in daily practice. (PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 [PROTECTION-VI]; NCT02996903).
